ML/AI/LLM

can you confirm if this is the case for staging and prod too @111561876209776

~Claude

Because nothing is configured to slice them by time — by default PM2 just opens out_file/error_file once and appends forever. To get time-based files you need one of: 1. pm2-logrotate module (easiest): pm2 install pm2-logrotate pm2 set pm2-logrotate:rotateInterval '0 0 * * *' # daily at midnight pm2 set pm2-logrotate:max_size 10M pm2 set pm2-logrotate:retain 7 1. Produces out__YYYY-MM-DD_HH-mm-ss.log files. 2. System logrotate — drop a config in /etc/logrotate.d/beyondchats-node with daily, rotate 7, copytruncate (needed since PM2 holds the FD open). 3. App-side logger …

So the log saved (only 2 at a time error and out) are of variable time frame it can be 1 day long or 5 days long depending on when the server will restart

There infact is no logrotate.d entry for the node server

I’m actually looking at it right now

<media>

whats the reason for date based logs not being created on dev?

already answered. we dont need to build a shipper, that is outside the scope. re-read the task. It uploads on demand

And as there is no handler / shipper the beyondchatsnew bucket does not have logs, for that we need to build the shipper that uploads from node but node does not store in the date naming convention

● The endpoint expects a file at /home/ubuntu/beyondchats-node/logs/info_06-05-2026.log (stream + DD-MM-YYYY), but the directory only contains error.log and out.log — no per-date files exist. So the 404 is accurate: nothing is writing daily info_*.log / error_*.log files for ml-node. A few possibilities: 1. Wrong service — the daily info_DD-MM-YYYY.log / error_DD-MM-YYYY.log pattern is what background-flask uses (/home/ubuntu/background-flask/logs/). If you wanted Flask logs, this endpoint won't reach them — it only reads beyondchats-node/logs/. 2. Logger not deployed / not …

Apparently according to Claude on dev there is no log handler for s3 and and then node does not save the logs with the dates and only flask saves with dates

● Based on my investigation, here are the answers — and the short version is there is no log shipper, which is why the S3 prefix is empty. 1. Log shipper to S3 None exists. No cron job, no systemd unit, no PM2 process, no app-level uploader writes PM2 logs to S3. Confirmed by: - crontab -l (ubuntu): only memory-heal.sh and the Laravel schedule:run. - /etc/cron.d, /etc/cron.{hourly,daily,weekly}: nothing log-related. - pm2 list: no shipper process (only ml-node, ml-node-scraper, workers, redis queues, etc.). - grep across beyondchats-node for s3 cp|sync|putObject|upload.*lo…

<media>

can login to dev server @111561876209776

What was the another task

<media>

@54125194641609 we will need drmalpani to give us access to his gmail, till then this task is a blocker

I can come through phone

Is 3 fine ? I’ll not get my laptop back till evening though, screen repair hone gayi hai

@54125194641609 when are you available for a meet?

Okay 👍

FYI: laravel is at: /var/www/html/chatgpt3_backend node is at: ~

I don’t have access to my laptop right now, will confirm as soon as I start working

@54125194641609 can you confirm if you can access it?

yes

Okay

Claude is on dev server right?

added this to the list of authorized keys on dev

ssh -i <path_to_your_private_key> ubuntu@dev.beyondchats.com

you can ssh into dev server now

Can you also check if log files are saved on dev server on aws? I was testing laravel endpoint for 2 week old dev message, it fetched data for the message perfectly but it couldn’t find in s3

So is this why the new endpoints are not working? On dev?

ci pipeline was failing because of a stale lock file. This can be checked via gitlab

The log endpoint is also not online on dev

@111561876209776 didn’t update even before my last to last mr

Merged another mr still didn’t work

i merged on dev and the endpoint is not up

@111561876209776 is node server not updating with dev?

have chat_history as an optional param

i think making the one with 2 parameters prompt and message would be better, we will be able to see how the bot performs with system prompt

or should i just leave it to prompt

should i make 2 parameters prompt and message in the api ek mein system prompt hoga and ek mein message

but bareflow mein there will be no system prompt

like right now we have system prompts in codebase and use message from api call

??

bare flow mein messages ka column banau ya fir prompt hi rehne du

@111561876209776

Custom send message pipeline with no extra stuff, will get prompt and org id in api itself, return only response and search queries connect with ram for dataset preparation [as raw as possible] bugs logging with auto attach with app script

ML/AI Connect Monday, 18 May · 5:30 – 6:00pm Time zone: Asia/Kolkata Google Meet joining info Video call link: https://meet.google.com/wdv-wquf-sds

Link

@111561876209776

I’m waiting for meet only

Yes yes

@54125194641609 reminder

Sure

lets connect by 5:30

@111561876209776 can connect at 4:30 too I have reached home

Sprint 16-30 related

agenda?

Around 5:30 works?

@111561876209776 when can we connect today

updated your view on sheet, should be visible now

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FWIHJSrvqbBmzw4liPbsTGVjaZKUWSR2MTt_BFknMkg/edit?tab=t.0 api docs

Add the env var to the Node .env: LOG_FETCH_API_KEY=bc-Logs-xcr4LOvhF7TVoDkIQ0XSeXrckGgWQy6o

add this to their .env files, Add the env var to /path/to/laravel/.env: BUG_LOGS_APP_KEY=bc-Logs-xcr4LOvhF7TVoDkIQ0XSeXrckGgWQy6o

I have merged log fetch branches for node nd laravel

product sheet pe nahi hai ye

Okay

<media>

<media>

@54125194641609

<media>

Cybersecurity

Oooo

this API needs to be an authenticated one so add some API key similar to how x-api-key is there for bgflask and node to call laravel. The google sheet will include the API key in its requests to laravel. Make sure the path building is always scoped to “logs” dir only and is hacker proof.

this is how I am expecting the flow to be: s3 has a logs dir now. buggy message_id = 2544 -> laravel API called -> finds message was created on 13th may -> frames s3 link for the log file -> fetches from s3 -> if found then returns the s3 link -> if not then searches for the file locally -> if file found then uploads to s3 + returns s3 link otherwise 404 (meaning log file probably got rotated and is lost now)

I'll just fetch the file

I thought it would make it easier for the devs

Alright

itta toh humans khud karlege using ctrl + f on the message string

you dont need to filter the log file’s content for the message’s timeframe

Okay

just fetch that entire’s day log file

I'll then get the logs for the date

Using message id I'll get the dates

From the log files

Arre but I have to fetch according to the time frame na

create dummy log files and place them in appropriate paths?

To test attaching log files

why do you need a dummy log file

Can you send me a dummy log file

They do but testing is an issue

do projects not have “paths” and naming conventions defined for the log files?

I'm lost at log files

So how do you retrieve them?

yes

They are stored in the server right?

@111561876209776 how do we get log files

thanks

@111561876209776 sent you invite

Would add you to the repo in 30 mins

Omw home

<media>

@54125194641609 i dont have access to your laravel fork

reviewing it now

okayy thanks

inserted part is what it stores and the metadata is a json object

{ "status": "error", "status_code": 202, "message": "Trace accepted", "data": { "message_id": 999999, "source": "curl_test", "inserted_count": 3, "skipped_count": 1, "inserted": [ { "id": 61, "type": 0, "type_label": "llm", "provider": "gemini", "model": "gemini-2.5-flash", "associable_id": 999999, "metadata": { "function_name": "final_response", "latency_ms": 11798, …

Added flask, node and Laravel to staging just now

@54125194641609 updates?

node separate and bg flask separate update the columns on php sub task -> Chat w Model in node auto attach log files api for both Laravel and node

Waiting room

Joining

https://meet.google.com/cka-jieb-iwc

Link?

Okay

lets connect by 5:30

5:10 tak send the link here

Yes yes 3 mins

@54125194641609 available?

yes

Is five fine?

meet schedule karlo anytime before 6:30 or after 8:30

Regarding auto attach relevant log files Automating whether a prompt based bug really fixed the issue

@111561876209776 when can we connect

@111561876209776 prompt based fixing doc

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kaSq3jYc3XXT_TPuOJiwKbEAHVWHhYuCIQd8ddF4rM4/edit?usp=sharing

also deploy dev fails on node

Quick sanity check before re-testing To confirm the route is registered after clearing: php artisan route:list | grep save_llm_api_logs Expected output: POST api/save_llm_api_logs ........ LlmApiLogController@saveTrace If that line is missing, the deploy didn't pull the new code — check that routes/api_flask.php on the server actually has the line we added. If the line is there but says GET, something else got weird and we'd need to look closer

claude says this

Run on the dev server (in the Laravel folder): php artisan route:clear php artisan route:cache The first wipes any cached route table, the second rebuilds it from the current files (skip the second if your prod/dev isn't using route caching — just route:clear is enough). After this, hit Postman again — you should get 202.

can you look into it

but i do not think that the route is live

@111561876209776 i merged into dev of the laravel server

when will the supression gate mr go live?

also the suppression flow is still uncommented

would you like me to add any more functions on to the trace loop, although i used claude to map out all the functions in the send message flow that should be traced

@111561876209776 this google doc contains the entire send message flow from the node side to flask side

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zZ7AjzKTSmJ0tLyMA7lTHnwp9172FUGp5QPUrKt9NEA/edit?usp=sharing

No issue

thanks. live on prod now

on staging @111561876209776

.

https://gitlab.com/sid6i7/ci-templates/-/blob/prod/docs/DEVELOPER_WORKFLOW.md?ref_type=heads

then create the mr?

should i checkout a new branch, pull dev on dev and then merge dev with new branch?

dev is never expected to be in sync with staging or prod

@111561876209776 is prod dev and staging again out of sync 🥲

merging on dev branch

worked

okay

add greeting rules to liter prompt for now

Should I proceed with this?

Ho gaya

Doing

@54125194641609

l602HvgeWkGyyLO02kAL4HvYjyZACOrrU2Mvi9CtKCoDONz6#uWsQzaOPCgPLDu5pVhOEKv-bd74kxd8DmB-mpRyszls

here

https://claude.com/cai/oauth/authorize?code=true&client_id=9d1c250a-e61b-44d9-88ed-5944d1962f5e&response_type=c ode&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fplatform.claude.com%2Foauth%2Fcode%2Fcallback&scope=org%3Acreate_api_key+user%3A profile+user%3Ainference+user%3Asessions%3Aclaude_code+user%3Amcp_servers+user%3Afile_upload&code_challenge=sc2 c44v4KqlpR6KRkmq54e28e6yYkdtvIvcvsX_g7no&code_challenge_method=S256&state=uWsQzaOPCgPLDu5pVhOEKv-bd74kxd8DmB-mp Ryszls

just a second

@111561876209776 let me know when you get free, claude login karna hai

what do you say @111561876209776

i feel 2nd is the best approach, we can use it for other orgs too if needed (we can use modular prompt building for della, like on lite prompt file we will pass the org host url and there we will add details to the prompt based on the org)

now to fix we can add a conditional statement, it will either skip della from lite model switch, we can use modular prompt building for della, like on lite prompt file we will pass the org host url and there we will add details to the prompt based on the org, and lastly we can use regex

we just ask it to be polite and do not tell anything about greetings

@111561876209776

the lite model does not have greeting rules for anyone infact

When user says Hi, switch to a liter model, on respond to user line 111

on this bug the issue is happening because

Bot is still greeting the user with: "Hello! How may I assist you today?" https://beyond-chats.netlify.app/della-resorts-68c353073b0f4/114270 1) debug why 2) propose fixes

Okay

@54125194641609 can you work on this first: row 433. ETA for it is today

yes

Same workflow right?

invited: https://gitlab.com/Pankaj-Baranwal/background-flask

@111561876209776 shone ka upstream access nahi hai for flask

Yes okay

@54125194641609 share your tasklist on meetings when u start work

i am taking this forward

Okay

Yes yes, ik that I'm following that for all the new branches

Usually I did git checkout main, get pull upstream prod, git checkout merge branch

https://gitlab.com/sid6i7/ci-templates/-/blob/prod/docs/DEVELOPER_WORKFLOW.md?ref_type=heads

Toh I thought it would be safer, I'll follow the flow from now

And I didn't know about the changing of structures for repos

Oh that is because jab ye banaya tha uske baad mereko upstream ka access mila tha

you merge your feature branch into dev

you never merge dev into your feature branch

the flow should have been: 1. ⁠git checkout dev 2. ⁠git pull upstream dev 3. ⁠git merge testMR 4. ⁠resolve MR conflicts 5. ⁠git push upstream dev (or MR then merge on gitlab)

Merge request from my fork

okay but why did you push the feature branch to your remote

Alright

updated staging

I think ye saare dev se aagye hai, I merged this with dev first to check toh merge conflicts fix kr raha tha

Alright

give me 5 mins i am updating the staging branch to match prod

@54125194641609 this MR contains unrelated commits: https://gitlab.com/Shoney13/beyondchats-node/-/merge_requests/228

.

.